"David B. Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Under "A note about optional<bool>" is the line: > > Second, optional<> provides and implicit conversion to bool. > > Of course, it should be "an". > Fixed, thanks!
>An even subtler nitpick is that in the > line: > > First, it is functionally similar to a tristate boolean (false, > maybe,true) -such as boost::tribool-, except that in a tristate > boolean, the maybe state represents a valid value, unlike the > corresponding state of an uninitialized optional<bool>. > > I think two hyphens should be used for the em-dashes (or the > actual em-dash character, which is probably not portable). Also, > the comma after the em-dash is probably not necessary (even > though it would be if the parenthetical phrase were not present). > Fixed. Thanks again!! BTW: It took me a little to understand what you've said because I didn't know about the em-dash. But I found a nice explanation on the web about em/en-dashes, the hyphen, and their correct uses. I used — directly since I found many boost documents using it. > Otherwise, the documentation looks great! > Thank you! Fernando Cacciola _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
