"David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Fernando Cacciola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > With BCC5.5.1 typename is _never required_ AFAIK, but it is with BCC5.6.0(4) > > I guess in that case BOOST_TYPENAME or BOOST_NO_TYPENAME might be an > appropriate name.
I like BOOST_TYPENAME, FWIW. > I'm glad I didn't move on the renaming before you > revealed the Borland issue! > Me too... I would have spoken early, but Internet Access became very restricted on the office, so it took me some time to arrange things to get back to a regular list reading, and I missed quite some posts during the transition. I'm not on-line during the whole day anymore, but I'm getting in a couple of times daily. Fernando Cacciola _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
