Philippe A. Bouchard wrote:

Larry Evans wrote:


Kevin Cadieux wrote:


[snip]

It's pretty good.  "ip_assign_op_switch" is faster than "ip_offset_iterator"
but must be explicit?

I was afraid of that(as indicated in 6.2.2 of the .html file); however, ip_offset_iterator
is more "robust" (as indicated in 6.2.3 item 2). Maybe some boost template guru's
could figure a way to hack a "virtual template member function" as mentioned in
item 4 of 6.1.2.



An index.html would be great; an objective point of view.




I'm still working on it. I thought the uml was pretty clear, but I thought I
just implement it to make sure I hadn't missed anything. Sure enough, I
had. I'm working on the implementation now and will modify the
doc's when that's done.


Thanks for the feedback.


_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to