"Gennaro Prota" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [...]
> I don't know if it's useful or not but it's certainly usable. The fact
> that deduction fails in your case doesn't mean it fails always; and
> for named templates there's still the possibility to explicit specify
> template arguments. In your case, you could do:
> [...]
>     foo f(x, (X*)0 );
> [...]

The problem is that it doesn't scale very well.  I would like to
forward c'tors that take around 8-10 arguments.

Dave



_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to