"Gennaro Prota" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [...] > I don't know if it's useful or not but it's certainly usable. The fact > that deduction fails in your case doesn't mean it fails always; and > for named templates there's still the possibility to explicit specify > template arguments. In your case, you could do: > [...] > foo f(x, (X*)0 ); > [...]
The problem is that it doesn't scale very well. I would like to forward c'tors that take around 8-10 arguments. Dave _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost