>> The patch to is_class would work if is_function could be called with >> a reference, so I think it's worth to consider fixing is_function. As >> John is the expert, I think he can decide whether it's better to wait >> for the SourceForge-folks to fix he lock-problem or if it's easy >> enought (and thus faster) to fix is_function... > >If it was easy enough it would be fixed long before the release. In any >case, I would be strongly opposite to sticking in a new implementation >just now. It's bad enough "the patch" got us delayed for more than a >day.
Aleksey has done the revert and the tests that were failing are now passing.
AFAICS, the only outstanding issue is lexical_cast on g++ 2.95.x causing date_time library failures.
As soon as that is dealt with, we will release. In the meantime, no other changes should be made to RC_1_30_0 please.
Thanks,
--Beman
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
