"Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That change does not seem to make a difference. The compiler errors are still > exactly the same.
Does 2.96 want the default argument (=0) to be repeated? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost