"Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> That change does not seem to make a difference. The compiler errors are still
> exactly the same.

Does 2.96 want the default argument (=0) to be repeated?
-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to