"David B. Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is this is a worthwhile idea to pursue? Am I missing any critical > details? I realize there is still a problem with const vs. non-const > references, but I won't even try to solve that. ;)
That's a pretty major problem, though. Your idea also cuts off implicit conversions. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
