"Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --- "Rozental, Gennadiy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Not all^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^HNo compilers are perfectly standard-compliant. >> >> Ih this case I would not want to make this change. After all it's only >> warning. > > The patch is only in RC_1_30_0. > The warnings are creating a lot of noise. As you said the inline is ignored, > and our multi-platform builds show that all other compilers are quite happy > with it. I'd highly appreciate if the patch could stay in RC_1_30_0.
The idea that anyone would go out of his way to remove innocuous warning suppression at this point seems a little perverse to me. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
