"Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --- David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Beman, here is an idea: I could check in the patch now and restart our >> > multi-platform Boost.Python regression tests. When we hear back from David >> we >> > have the results already. Then we can decide what to do based on all the >> > information that we have. >> >> You should do that. Beman has retired for the day due to a cold. >> Let me know how the tests go. > > I've checked in the patch and we will restart the tests as soon as the > Sourceforge server is cooperating.
Whoops, the patch is wrong. This business: # ifdef BOOST_MSVC // MSC works without this workaround, but needs another one ... -# define BOOST_PYTHON_OPAQUE_SPECIALIZED_TYPE_ID(Pointee) \ +# define BOOST_PYTHON_OPAQUE_SPECIALIZED_TYPE_ID(Pointee) \ BOOST_BROKEN_COMPILER_TYPE_TRAITS_SPECIALIZATION(Pointee) # else should be: # if BOOST_WORKAROUND(BOOST_MSVC, <= 1300) // MSC works without this workaround, but needs another one ... -# define BOOST_PYTHON_OPAQUE_SPECIALIZED_TYPE_ID(Pointee) \ +# define BOOST_PYTHON_OPAQUE_SPECIALIZED_TYPE_ID(Pointee) \ BOOST_BROKEN_COMPILER_TYPE_TRAITS_SPECIALIZATION(Pointee) # else Otherwise, it will break vc7.1 I'm fairly certain. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
