>From: "Terje Slettebų" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >From: "Rozental, Gennadiy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > If these are omitted for g++ 2.95.x, all tests pass for that compiler. > > > However, as it compiles without errors on both MSVC 6 and g++ > > > 2.95.x, maybe > > > one shouldn't have any BOOST_WORKAROUND's in the test code? > > > > > > That will make it show up as failing on MSVC 6 and g++ > > > 2.95.x, even though > > > it passes almost all the enabled tests on both. > > > > You could use expected failures feature of Boost.Test > > Aha. That could be an odd test, though
Sorry, I misunderstood. I thought it was testing for failure, when I realised that "expected failures" is something else, in the framework. Yes, using it could be a possibility. It seems just right for the task. Regards, Terje _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
