>I don't know how close the release schedule is now, but if we could at >least change the version check from 0x0561 to 0x0564 that would be >extrely useful. > >This would make the difference between our being able to use boost 1_30 >'out-the-box' (as I half-promised our deparment) and having to apply >in-house patches again. > >I am currently doing a search for other places where borland v 0x0561 is >assumed, as I don't think the latest patch fixed any issues that would >affect boost and it would be a shame to have to choose between boost and >the patch. >(especially as Samuel put so much effort into getting this version to be >Borland compatible! I have mailed him separately off-list in case he is >not actively monitoring right now, but I know release is close)
OK, I've made the second set of suggested changes.
--Beman
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
