Gennaro Prota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 23 Mar 2003 13:26:04 -0500, David Abrahams > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>That sounds right. Would you like to post a proposed replacement (or >>patch) for the page as written which addresses your points? > > You embarrass me.
Unintended. > I think the page is ok as long as you don't say > "during" stack unwinding; also I would prefer "could exit via an > exception" rather than "could throw". More-or-less: > > "Don't embed a std::string object or any other data member or base > class whose copy constructor could exit via an exception. That could > lead you straight from the point of throw to std::terminate()" > > Maybe you can also add an exclamation point as a pinch of sound > intimidation :-) I'm just too busy at the moment to make the edits, which is why I suggested you post a replacement. Often you'll find problems with suggested changes when viewed in context. Send me a replacement privately if you like. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
