On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Edward Diener wrote:
> Do you really want the key to an associative container to be an optional
> value ? I would be hard-pressed to find a use for that.
FWIW, the Signals library actually does this internally (although with
boost::any objects instead of boost::optional objects). However, I would
contend that the need is too specialized to warrant adding an operator<.
Doug
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
