Anthony Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thomas Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Anthony Williams wrote: >> > IMHO, it seems more logical to split the concept, so >> >> > the grouping of >> > the iterators is separated from the transformation >> >> By "separating the grouping and the transforming," do >> you mean to write an iterator that holds a tuple of >> iterators and then, upon dereferencing, returns the >> tuple of dereferenced values, and then use that in >> conjunction with boost's transforming iterator? > > Yes, this is exactly what I meant.
I had the same instinctual reaction to Doug's idea of grouping the iterators together: "no, split them apart more!" -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost