This really neat, and useful, but I really don't like either name.
Two suggestions:
comparisons - because the whole point is more than one compare.
or
compair - because one is comparing pairs. (Do I hear you groan? Not punny?) But perhaps the dreadfulness will make is more memorable?
at least this one is short. i think only short names should be considered because nobody will use it if he has to write more than for the equivalent if-else cascade.
2) I'm not sure that the choice of the name is ideal. OTOH, I can't think
of a better one...
lexicographic?
This implies something to do with lexicons, which is too restrictive, and even misleading.
actually i like it. because it has a similar behaviour as the according std algorithm as gennaro has pointed out. although it is quite long a name.
btw: what is the typical process to find the name for a component. because it seems to me that there is some interest in this thing.
jan
-- jan langer ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] "pi ist genau drei"
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
