> If the issue concerns you this much, you might propose something along the > lines of BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS. > > That is, you might try: "BOOST_NO_RTTI anyone?" > > - Eric
I did. As a user defined parameter. Terrie made a point that it should be config parameter cause some embedded compiler indeed does not provide this functionally (maybe because it's taking too much space to implement?). No consequences yet. Gennadiy. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
