Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just did an intel-win32 clean and then limits_test. It compiled, linked, > and ran without error.
That's greate but doesn't tell me very much. It's just one test (with one version?) of the compiler. > >What does it mean that intel5,6 still report > >BOOST_NO_ARGUMENT_DEPENDENT_LOOKUP? I don't know what to do with > >this information. > > Because # define BOOST_NO_ARGUMENT_DEPENDENT_LOOKUP is (or was, until I > removed it) hardwired into intel.hpp when used with msvc? I don't know; what does config_test say now? I would think that config_test would not use the Boost config, but then maybe I don't understand its purpose. > Be careful about making changes at this point. AFAICS, the > intel-win32-tools.jam and intel.hpp stuff is working far better than > it ever has. I'm not planning on doing anything else to it. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
