Joel de Guzman wrote: > Looks good. But why not overload the name "namespace" in as much > as the CPP overloads #if #else ? I think the syntax should give a nice > feeling since it is already looks like something C++ programmers are > already accustomed to:
> Either way, any syntax will do as long as it works :) If you really > want to go the import/export route, consider a modula-2-ish syntax: I actual names of the directives I don't really care about. #region/#endreg, #scope/#endscope, #module/#endmodule are all fine with me. I don't personally like #namespace/#endnamespace, but I could live with it. What I want (and what we need) is the more general mechanism allowing named scopes. My proposal, including import/export, would allow both the current model and the more general model. Paul Mensonides _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
