"John Torjo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > assert( (i < j) || (i == 0) || (j == 1) ); would change into > SMART_ASSERT( (v_(i) < v_(j)) || (i == 0) || (j == 1) ); > > The output of the above (in case the assertion fails) can look like: > > Assertion failed: > '(v_(i) < v_(j)) || (i < 0) || (v_(k) == -1)' > i= '3' > j= '2' > k= '1' > This feature looks handy. Short macro like "v_" is IMHO acceptable, it won't clash with definition like: int v_;
I wounder if it could be somehow merged with http://www.cuj.com/experts/2104/alexandr.htm?topic=experts ? /Pavel _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
