"Justin M. Lewis" wrote: > > Yes, it is better. > > The first example has the problem of, you still have to go look up the > function to see if it's actually changing anything, or if it's taking the > param in, reading teh value, then modifying based on what was read.
Then how about: boost::tuple< boost::shared_ptr< LargeObject > > result = f( largeObjectSharedPtr ); > The second example has the problem of copying a potentially large object, > and it doesn't allow for in/out params. I'm still not convinced that in/out parameters are necessary. Noel -- NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender. Sender does not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
