| -----Original Message-----
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of William E. Kempf
| Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 8:40 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: [boost] Boost Library Guidelines

| > This sounds 'best practice'.  If others agree, can it be added to the
| > guidelines?
| 
| It sounds good in theory, but I've never been comfortable living with it. 
| I know others do, but in my experience, especially with the MS compiler,
| the highest warning level produces a LOT of meaningless diagnostics which
| can be very difficult to eliminate... even with pragmas.  As a "best
| practice suggestion", it's a great idea... as a requirement, I'd have to
| voice an opinion against.

I absolutely agree, but I feel it would be useful encourage authors to try.

Paul


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to