| -----Original Message----- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of William E. Kempf | Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 8:40 PM | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: RE: [boost] Boost Library Guidelines
| > This sounds 'best practice'. If others agree, can it be added to the | > guidelines? | | It sounds good in theory, but I've never been comfortable living with it. | I know others do, but in my experience, especially with the MS compiler, | the highest warning level produces a LOT of meaningless diagnostics which | can be very difficult to eliminate... even with pragmas. As a "best | practice suggestion", it's a great idea... as a requirement, I'd have to | voice an opinion against. I absolutely agree, but I feel it would be useful encourage authors to try. Paul _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost