Douglas Paul Gregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, David Abrahams wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hartmut Kaiser) writes: >> > What about re-introducing the boost/iterator_adaptors.hpp file: >> > >> > #define BOOST_ITERATOR_ADAPTOR_VERSION 0x2000 >> > #include <boost/iterator/iterator_adaptor.hpp> >> > >> > This would allow for some version tracking and a smooth migration path >> > for those libraries, willing to support both, the new _and_ the old >> > iterator libs. Thought's? >> >> OK, that seems reasonable. Libraries can check to see if >> BOOST_ITERATOR_ADAPTOR_VERSION is defined and use different code in >> that case. > > Can't we just use BOOST_VERSION? (1.31.0 will have the new iterator > adaptors anyway)
I think the idea is to allow code to work with CVS versions between 1.30.0 and 1.31.0 -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost