"Jonathan D. Turkanis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Yes, this is very elegant. No codecvt's in sight -- just pure adaptors. Also > nice treatment of optional template parameters. It puts my design (and > certain my implementation) to shame. I should have thought more about the > general idea of composition before responding to posts. I stole the idea of Named Template Parameters from Boost Iterator Adapters white papers. :) _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
