Daryle Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sunday, June 15, 2003, at 10:15 AM, Robert Ramey wrote: > >> Hmmmm - I never imagined that something like this would be so >> problematic. >> >> For now with my VC 7.0 compiler I can use the following and it >> gives me almost exactly what I need. The warning message points >> exactly to the place in my code where I have invoked it - just like >> BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT. >> >> I would hope something like this could be boostified so that I could >> use it outside of a function. > [TRUNCATE] > > My point was that warnings are non-portable constructions made up by > compiler makers.
So are the semantics of #include. That doesn't mean we can't count on certain similarities (though they may be hard to find). -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
