On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 09:47:50 +0200, Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paul A Bristow wrote:
I am confident that your system also generates efficient code using an efficient compiler. But have you considered or tried debugging?
Currently, I don't have time for that. Maybe at the weekend, but I can't promise. But I agree that it should be verified in practice.
What should be verified?
How efficient different compilers work with the template-approach I showed. I'll try to do that for the GCC 2.95 / 3.x and for the Intel compiler (v7) at the weekend, but my experience with reading x86-assembler is limited, so maybe I'll just run some benchmarks. As I don't have/use Windows, I can't verify compilers for this platform.
What I'd also like to hear is opinions from others here on the list. What do you think?
FWIW, I agree with everything you've said (except, maybe, the comment about debugging above). The arguments that Paul gives for his approach(es) are something beyond me.
Thanks. For the arguments that Paul gives, I'd also welcome comments from the people that gave these arguments from their work/environment. I still think that this shouldn't be ignored, but I just don't really understand the reasons and I'd like to see these people comment on the code I showed.
Regards, Daniel
-- Daniel Frey
aixigo AG - financial training, research and technology Schloß-Rahe-Straße 15, 52072 Aachen, Germany fon: +49 (0)241 936737-42, fax: +49 (0)241 936737-99 eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], web: http://www.aixigo.de
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
