Gennaro Prota wrote:

In fact it's not a matter of speed, but of precision. I'm sure there
are compilers where the -sin(pi/2.) in the example code is faster than
-sin(pi/two ). However an overload allows you to specify that the
value of, say, arccos(-1) [math::acos(minus_one)] is exactly pi.

Also, using constructs like this is easier for the programmer. You don't have to search to see if there is a pi/2 constant and find out what it is called, you simply use:
boost::pi / boost::two
or whatever. This also makes it easier to read, rather than
arccos_minusone
and
pi_2


What about 2/pi:
  2_pi // illegal
  _2_pi or two_pi // counter intuitive

Using overloads makes it easier to extend this set in a clean, consistent way.

Regards,
Reece

_________________________________________________________________
Use MSN Messenger to send music and pics to your friends http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to