> Except for one problem. If the second run of "bcp" selects less files than > the first, and you only ovewrite files, not clean up the entire directory, > the number of files will not be reduced. Uncessasary ones will just lay in > the directory.
Good point, however I've sometimes used it that way deliberately (if I've forgotten something), even so it has a problem with overwriting read only files (boost.filesystem won't let you do that). > :-( > I start to understand why Gennadiy Rozental was saying that dependency from > program_options to function is a bit too much --- don't feel all that good > about adding 2Megs just for command line parsing. Of course, this only > matters when packaging library separately. Agreed - it's not quite 2Megs though: 1.39Mb on disk, and zips up to 235K, even so... John. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
