Hi Bruce, > Vladimir Prus wrote: > > There's another question: why store "u" at all. I'm > > guessing "source(*ei, g)" might be more efficient? > > That's a good thought, but there might be a problem > trying to dereference a past-the-end iterator. I > mentioned before that ei_end could always be generated > from u instead of storing it, but it's just a question > of trading cycles for bytes. Which resource is more > critical?
I don't know. It *seems* that source(*ei, g) should be pretty fast, but only seems. > > 1. It needs license from you. > > Can you copy the standard license in for me? Done. > > 3. Maybe, the FAQ, either fully or partically, must > > be added too. > > How about adding: > > // FAQ's can be found at: > // > http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/boost/msg48752.php > If you happen to know that one of those links can be > counted on to persist, then the other three aren't > really needed. I think the first link is reliable. Your patch is now comitted to CVS. Thanks! - Volodya _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost