Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote: > Peter Dimov wrote: >> >> Also, please note that I don't mind the _developer summary_ being >> "aggressive" in its pass/fail reports. There are no "expected >> failures" there as far as I'm concerned. Every failure needs to be >> reported in red, with pass->fail transitions emphasized. > > Do you mean that there are no expected failures for the smart_ptr > library (which we'll take care of soon), or something else? 'Cause I, > for instance, definitely would like to see a CVS health report in > terms of regressions rather than absolute failures.
I meant that my objections applied to the user summary, not the developer summary, and that I personally don't need a way to mask a 'fail' on the developer summary, even if I expect a test to fail on this configuration. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
