Daniel Frey wrote:

Sure. But still compose.hpp is in itself incomplete. And it completes the standard's parts on function objects so I think it might be desirable to supply compose_f_gxy_hxy. If we take bind into account here, we could just as well remove compose.hpp completly, couldn't we? Or was this your suggestion?



I thought bind was the preferred method over compose now. This lead me to believe that compose was left in for backwards compatibility. I haven't actually used compose, so don't know if there are things it can do that bind doesn't, mind you.


Thanks

Russell


_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to