[2003-06-26] Beman Dawes wrote: >At 03:29 PM 6/26/2003, Rene Rivera wrote: > > >I would think that since the Library Proposal of the interface is a > >separate > >document than the Boost implementation+docs of that interface they would > >have different licenses. And therefore not present a problem when the > >Library Proposal is accepted as then some sort of license transfer to the > >standards organization would happen. > > > >But I guess Beman should bring that up with the lawyers also ;-) > >Ha! You've never dealt with ISO, I guess. They are a world unto themselves >and their views on copyrights are pretty high-handed.
No I haven't. And I get the fealing that I should run away if said beast approaches ;-) -- grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- rrivera (at) acm.org - grafik (at) redshift-software.com -- 102708583 (at) icq _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
