I would like to see if there is interest in incorporating the FC++Whoa! I've taken a look into FC++ at one occasion and found it most impressive. :)
library into Boost.
With regards to (1), I hope yes, but the Boost Lambda Library has a bitI've written some code of my own that uses lots of functoids (basically, sort of not-quite continuations) and found out to my horror that Boost::lambda (and the entire STL machinery in general) is not very comfortable with them. If the inclusion of FC++ into Boost could provide a greater compatibility between template<T> struct ... { operator() ...} and struct ... { template<T> ... operator(); } worlds, that would be a very worthwile goal in its own right. :)
of conceptual overlap with FC++, so I can imagine this issue being
potentially contentious. (FC++ and Lambda ostensibly provide much of the
same kinds of functionality, but while there is overlap, each library
does a lot of "its own thing" too. I (and Jaakko too, probably) can say
more about this if necessary.)
Miro
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
