Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Unless you are prepared to depart >> from your usual "hint-dropping" style and explain why you think CPL is >> better than what we're considering, I think it's probably going to >> remain... wherever it is that droppings end up. > > Sorry, I really can't explain it better than > > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/os-cplfaq.html
Since that faq has no entries comparing CPL to the proposed Boost license text or explaining why Alexander Terekhov considers CPL better, it doesn't even begin to address the question. I'm fairly certain that you could do a little bit better than that with only a small effort. > regards, > alexander. > > P.S. http://ntxshape.sourceforge.net/opensource.html P.S. http://www.anthro.net/guides/promotion.shtml "... I suspect most humans hate long lists of URLs without descriptions." P.P.S. http://www.thrillingdetective.com/web_guy_2.html "...long lists of URLs or ISBNs aren't even interesting to begin with." P.P.P.S. http://www.nic.com/~csy2kt/errs.htm "[Mis]use of HTML - Usenet is not the Web. If your browser posts only in HTML, it's broken. If it repeats every post in text and HTML both, it's broken. Usenet is a plain text medium. You are welcome to post URLs but please explain WHY you think they are worth visiting." P.P.P.P.S. http://www.lava.net/~sch/faq.txt "* Naked URLs / Empty Posts - No, we don't want you to post your entire Web page (see above -- posts written in HTML will be rejected). Posting a URL is much better, but please tell us why you are doing it! Why should we go there?" etc. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
