Daniel Frey wrote: > > The libraries itself are relatively bug-free, but there are plenty of > > portability problems with some compilers. For the HP-UX, IRIX, and DEC > > compilers in the versions I have access to, it's probably a waste of > > time to try and fix problems, unless it's obvious what to do, because > > the compilers have relatively old front-ends with plenty of > > non-conformance issues. > > I wonder if it's possible to distinguish regressions into "fail" and "not > supported", where the latter means that it fails and we (currently?) > can't make it work. This way it might be easier to find regressions that > are supposed to work but fail because of "accidents" :)
See http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08641.html for the thread on this exact topic. Aleksey _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
