Jens Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> That's really odd.
>>
>> Everything works perfectly on my machine with gcc-3.2 and CWPro8.3
>> except for a numeric_traits_test failure with gcc-3.2 and that has no
>> relation to iterator_adaptors.
>
> I can't believe it. Very strange. I've just removed
> libs/utility and re-"cvs update"d it.
>
> I'm reading (for example) libs/utility/transform_iterator_example.cpp
>
> which contains:
>
> typedef boost::transform_iterator_generator<Function, int*>::type
> doubling_iterator;
>
> And this is gone for good, I thought. So this should fail the compile.
> If it doesn't, for you, then either the XML post-processing is doing
> something wrong, or the dependency checking of bjam isn't doing its
> job.
Maybe we're talking about different tests here? Is your CVS
up-to-date?
cd libs/utility/test
bjam -sTOOLS=gcc test
This works on Linux with gcc-3.2 gcc-2.95.3 gcc-2.96
> May I suggest that you remove (for example)
> (ALL_LOCATE_TARGET)/status/bin/transform_iterator_example.test
No wonder! That's not the utility suite; that's the iterator_adaptors
suite. Mostly an easy fix. There are already replacement tests in
libs/iterator/test.
> and try re-running the regression tests? If this shows a different
> result, you may want to clean ALL_LOCATE_TARGET completely. :-)
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
