Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 04:17 PM 7/12/2003, David Abrahams wrote: > > >> A single-pass iterator is required to support r++ (inherited from the > >> incrementable iterator requirements), but I guess that we've > >> unintentionally dropped the requiremnt for *r++ of readable > >> single-pass iterator, by allowing incrementable iterators to return > >> any type convertible to const X&. I think it should require that the > >> return type be X, the Assertion/Note/Precondition/Postcondition column > >> should be labelled "Operational Semantics" and the lower right entry > >> should be moved to the middle column. The same goes for the > >> lower-right entry of each of the following two tables. > >> > >> I'm going to make those changes; if there are objections, please let > >> me know ASAP. > > > >Done. > > In the main CVS? iterator-categories.html is still dated several days > ago. Or am I looking in the wrong place?
I guess so. Why would I be editing a document in the multi_array lib? I don't understand it, but Ron Garcia seems to have a fondness for checking duplicates of information that is hosted elsewhere into his library's tree. The source for that paper is kept in libs/iterator/docs/new-iter-concepts.rst and I keep an HTML version up-to-date at http://www.boost-consulting.com/writing/new-iter-concepts.html. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
