Ronald Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Abrahams wrote: >> I don't understand it, but Ron Garcia seems to have a fondness for >> checking duplicates of information that is hosted elsewhere into his >> library's tree. > > Since you and I previously discussed why multi_array has a private > copy of iterator_adaptors, I'm assuming a ":-)" goes here.
It ought to have, but I was in a particularly prickly mood at the time. Sorry about that. > If the new library alleviates the issues I had at the time, then I > should now be able to remove that local copy and use the newer > library in its place. This should follow shortly. Just to be sure, > are you referring to something else in the multi_array tree that > affirms my fondness for duplication? If so, please let me know. Just iterator_categories.html. I wouldn't have brought up iterator_adaptors.hpp since as you say, we discussed it already. > WRT the iterator_categories.html in multi_array, Beman wrote: > >> Ron added that last January. He wanted something in Boost releases >> to refer to, IIRC.. > > That's correct. I don't think that the new iterator concepts were > in the Boost tree at the time and their permanence at the existing > location wasn't clear to me. I will take a look at the new iterator > concept documentation. I presume that it will supercede the > documentation that multi_array currently uses once I change > multi_array's iterators accordingly. Let me know if there is any way I can help you. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
