I've upload fixdec23.zip to the Yahoo files section. I made some changes that Jens suggested to allow compiling with Comeau and gcc; and I've made the is_bounded and is_modulo fixes that Fernando suggested along with interoperatability with unsigned as well as int.
Fernando, I think that max_scale needs to be a constant expression because it's used in the definition of numeric_limits<decimal>: BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(int, digits=boost::fixdec::max_scale); BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(int, digits10=boost::fixdec::max_scale); And I think I'm right about numeric_limits<>::digits10. I believe it's intended to be mean that, if the value is N, then /all/ N-digit numbers can be represented. numeric_limits<decimal>::digits10 can't be 19 because only a subset of 19-digit numbers are representable. Also, I think that your statement: > > ... __int64 support 18 digits at most. > is factually incorrect. Your implementation's __int64 should support anything up to 10**63 - 1 or (with commas as thousands separators) 9,223,372,036,854,775,807. That's a 19-digit number. --Bill Seymour _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
