Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:26:43 +0200, David Abrahams wrote: > >> What does everybody think about doing a 1.30.1 release "RSN?" > > I think it's too late, let's go for a 1.31.0. I think that we'll hear > about problems with the 1.31.0 really soon after release and probably a > 1.31.1 can follow shortly after. For 1.30.0, we IMHO missed the > opportunity do to a 1.30.1 without lots of pain/work. As Beman already > said there is too much in CVS to "backport" it to a 1.30.1. The question > is, whether we learn from it for a 1.31.1 :)
I wouldn't dream of backporting everything we've done since 1.30.0. That would be pointless. There are just a few errors which prevent major portions of 1.30.0 from compiling. I backported all the important post-1.30.0 fixes immediately after hearing about them, but I'm not sure everyone else did. Note that 1.31.0 is going to be a code-breaking release for anyone who uses iterator adaptors, so it might be important for them to get a working 1.30.1. But anyway, I don't care that much. A .1 release is more work, and I'm all for avoiding work. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
