Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 09:36 AM 7/17/2003, David Abrahams wrote: > >Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> See win32-1_30_1 on http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/ > >> > >> I found I had to update the .../tools/build sub-tree to the current > >> main trunk in order to get the latest toolsets. Other than that, the > >> tests were run on the RC_1_30_0 branch. > > > >How can I tell if there were regressions? > > Regressions compared to the current main trunk or to the 1.30.0 release?
1.30.0 > One simple way to spot regressions compared to the current main trunk > is to look at VC++ 7.1. That only tells me about one compiler, and the main trunk (which I don't care about). > Except for Boost.Signals, it is currently passing 100% of all > tests. Thus any failures are regressions compared to the current > state. We're not trying to get things to be as good as the current CVS; we just want "better than 1.30.0". -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
