Hi Peter,
>
> If a compiler has a current function facility but is not currently
supported
> by current_function.hpp, if you show '(unknown)' users of this compiler
will
> spot the problem and submit a patch, or at least report it to us.
>
> If not, they may not even realize that the library could have given them
the
> name of the current function.
>
> Let me know if you remain unconvinced. :-)
>

Yes, I remain unconvinced ;-)
This is because some compilers do not provide such a FUNCTION facility.
VC6 is one of them. What should I do for it?

As a sidenote, I will give full details about SMART_ASSERT_CONTEXT in the
documentation of SMART_ASSERT - sorry it hasn't been done yet :-(

Best,
John



_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to