Hi Peter, > > If a compiler has a current function facility but is not currently supported > by current_function.hpp, if you show '(unknown)' users of this compiler will > spot the problem and submit a patch, or at least report it to us. > > If not, they may not even realize that the library could have given them the > name of the current function. > > Let me know if you remain unconvinced. :-) >
Yes, I remain unconvinced ;-) This is because some compilers do not provide such a FUNCTION facility. VC6 is one of them. What should I do for it? As a sidenote, I will give full details about SMART_ASSERT_CONTEXT in the documentation of SMART_ASSERT - sorry it hasn't been done yet :-( Best, John _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost