"Jan Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I think, I changed mind. The flatten() method can be substituted by something like > this: > > void doSomething(const int* pInt, size_t numInts); // C API > circular_buffer<int> intBuffer(10); > ... // > fill the buffer somehow > vector<int> v(intBuffer.begin(), intBuffer.end()); // copy > if (!v.empty()) doSomething(&v[0], v.size()); // pass the data to the API > > // &v[0] < &v[1] < ... < &v[n] > > I think, we should rather keep the interface minimal. > Yes but flatten() may be much more efficient, in some cases it may involve less or no copying at all and memory consumption won't be size() + capacity().
/Pavel _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
