Daniel Spangenberg wrote: > template <int Precision, int Range = -1> > class selected_real;
> template <int Range> > class selected_int; > typedef selected_int<9> MyInt; Those class templates may be of use for some people. However, until we get typedef templates into the C++ core language, there appears to be no way to defer the implementation of the type to, say, a plain "int". This can be fixed by making the selected_XXX classes template metafunctions that happen to return the correct type. Usage: typedef selected<int>(9)::type MyInt . Compare that with boost/integer.hpp where we have uint_t<N>::least and uint_t<N>::fast . Of course, if you compile on a platform that can't fulfill your precision/range desires, you should get a compile-time error. namespace boost::numeric is your friend. Jens Maurer _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
