Juanma Barranquero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:51:27 -0400 > David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I don't see what that has to do with the contradiction I quoted. >> First they say that GCCs newer than 2.95.x will be slower, then later >> they say that the fastest GCC they can find is 3.1. > > Well, OK. But, after reading the bit I quoted, I think we can assume > they're not self-contradictory, just sloppy writers :) > >> Well, and EH, probably. > > Why?
Because MSVC doesn't have a zero-runtime-overhead-unless-throwing EH model, while GCC does. Is it disabled for Cygwin GCC? I never bothered to check. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
