>Currently, BOOST_NO_EXPLICIT_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ARGUMENTS >is not defined for gcc. However, the following URL in the gcc bug >database > >http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7676 > >leads me to believe that the macro should be set on for the appropriate >versions of gcc. Matter of fact, I run with this problem myself and it >can be >workedaround with techniques similar to those employed for MSVC. See >for instance definitions of get() and workaround_holder in > >boost/tuple/detail/tuple_basic_no_partial_spec.hpp >
Thanks, The issue with gcc seems to be a little more specific than we normally set the macro for, but I don't see any reason why we shouldn't set it. Am I right in thinking that this is specific to gcc 3.1 and 3.2? Also do you have a test case that can be added to the appropriate config test? Thanks, John. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
