David Abrahams wrote: > David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Jeremy Siek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> I seem to remember the named parameters mechanism being fragile >>> under VC6. >> >> After a painstaking binary search in recent CVS states for the ICE, I >> narrowed it down to: > > <snip> > > Worked around now in CVS.
Had no idea my innocent change will break anything. Why doesn't vc6 like declarations of static methods inside class? - Volodya _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
