> > 1. i'm 99% sure that plain
> > resource language or even XML is much cleaner than c++ bindings-
> > templates-operators mess.
>
> Templates aren't always beautiful, but this library is targeted towards
> C++ programmers who should be familiar with them. We've had the STL for
> over 5 years now. I don't know how to read "plain resource language" or
> XML, but I know how to read C++. That said one of the primary goals of
> the library should be to make easy to write and read user code. I think
> the code generated using my library is pretty easy to read so far:
>
> gui_application<employee> gui = row("Name: ", edit(&employee::name));
>
Forgive me for not agreeing with you here ;-)
Just think how hard it is - even for a programmer -, when dealing with lets
say 50-100 types of windows, each window having more than 20-30 controls, to
have an OVERVIEW.
Not talking about maintaining that code.
Not talking about internationalization.
So IMHO resource files are THE option.
Best,
John
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
