Alisdair Meredith wrote: > > I am still not clear on the 'best' solution though. > Clearly the quickest fix is to simply put the swap specialization in > the correct namespace. > > However, boost code does not seem to specialize std::swap at all, but > rather provide its own swaps in namespace boost. Is this the > preferred approach? [using my own namespaces, obviously!]
http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#226 Summary: at present, the "best practice" is swap() overload in the class namespace and using std::swap; swap(x, y); at point of use. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
