[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
> After having followed this thread I wander if we are trying to > reinvent > the wheel. By googling a bit one can find plenty of "Gui Toolkits" and > here I saw little of them. Not a word on Qt, for example. I never > used it for an important project but they give a (good ?) solution for > example to the layout issues discussed so far. > If I should criticize them (as a lazy user who is in troble finding > his way among all those features) if the fact that there are huge > classes that probably need further decomposition of resposibilities. > > Anyway Qt make life simple for simple apps and provides something > that scales quite well for larger projects (I haven't used it but > I can use KDE as witness). > > So I would like to have a clearer idea of the difference between > the goal of this thread and existing solutions (i.e. Qt). At some degree it becomes political issues. I doubt Boost would want to take the same risky path I took (Corel). Philippe _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
