[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Walter) writes: [...]
| > This whole thing (-fabi-version) is messy. It is what one gets by | > taking users for beta testers ;-) | | That's not the whole story. When testing with GCC 3.3.1 prerelease I noticed | that setting -fabi-version isn't necessary anymore. So I filed a bug report | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11812, which immediately got | closed ;-). The subsequent discussion at | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11105 leads me to believe that | GCC 3.3 was too conservative w.r.t. ABI compatibility. | | Due to this and the fact that there's been another bug in GCC 3.3 | (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11198) which manifests when | using ublas, I tend to advise against using GCC 3.3 for ublas. GCC-3.3 is GCC-3.3.0 in disguise and I tend to refrain myself from using .0 releases outside of experimental works :-). More seriously, did you have a chance to test GCC-3.3.1? -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
